The federal government seemed ready on Wednesday to dispatch numerous of federal agents to the northern California for a significant border security initiative, sparking criticism from California leaders.
Specifics of the mission were still emerging, but it will reportedly include over a hundred law enforcement personnel, as reported. The officers are scheduled to begin occupying the military installation in the East Bay, facing San Francisco. It was not confirmed whether state soldiers would participate.
The operation follows an extended period of warnings by the president to take action against the liberal city. California’s governor Gavin Newsom denounced the move, describing it as “taken directly from the authoritarian playbook”.
“He deploys unidentified officers, he sends out border agents, he sends out ICE, he creates worry and terror in the community so that he can lay claim for addressing that by deploying the state troops,” Newsom said. “This mirrors the incendiary putting out the blaze.”
San Francisco is the most recent metropolitan center targeted by the federal effort of mass immigration arrests. The operation is expected to trigger a standoff between the administration and municipal authorities who have pledged to stop paramilitary operations in the city.
San Franciscans have been readying for weeks for Trump to fulfill frequent statements to send troops to the city. At a Wednesday afternoon press conference, San Francisco’s municipal chief reiterated that the city was ready.
“Over recent weeks, we have been expecting the possibility of an impending national intervention in our city,” declared the leader, explaining that he had taken further executive actions on Wednesday to “bolster the city’s assistance to our newcomer populations, and make certain our agencies are organized prior to any government operation.”
In spite of judicial disputes to deployments in a multiple urban areas, including the Windy City, Portland and LA, Trump has claimed “absolute authority” to send the state troops in cities, pointing to the presidential authority which enables presidents limited power to dispatch personnel on US soil.
The governor, who was formerly as San Francisco’s city leader – had pledged to take action “immediately” to a mission in the city. “The idea that the White House can dispatch personnel into our cities with no justification grounded in reality, no supervision, no answerability, no respect for state sovereignty – it’s a direct assault on the judicial framework,” he said on Wednesday.
Public associations, including civil rights groups formed in the first Trump administration, have prepped to swiftly gather a mass rally in the city, as well as peaceful assemblies at community centers.
In San Francisco’s Mission district, a mostly Latin American community, city supervisor informed journalists last week she and her residents had been bracing for this moment. “The point that workers cease employment, when anyone Black or brown can’t freely walk outside without the fear of national personnel targeting based on race and detaining them, the moment when students avoid classrooms, are too scared to go to the supermarket or medical provider,” she said. “The readiness efforts in the Mission is basically a closure the likes of which we have not witnessed since Covid.”
About several hundred out of several thousand California national guard troops remain federalized under an directive from Trump. Roughly 200 of them had been transferred to Oregon, where they were staying in standby amid a legal battle over their deployment.
This time, Newsom said he had summoned the state military personnel under his control to manage food banks during the government shutdown.
An avid hiker and travel writer with a passion for exploring Italy's natural wonders and sharing insights on sustainable tourism.